Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Dr Pen
@DrPen@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

Good morning from Elsevier. When I open my inbox to be greeted by this, I know the time has come to leave academia. It is rotten to the core, and totally lost sight of its *telos*. Read the article if you like. It is a lost delusion. States "AI is a tool" multiple times. It's not. Its a pattern matching text generator. (Jon Dron wrote a great piece on this recently.)

#academia #academicchatter #ai #genai
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/rethinking-peer-review-in-the-ai-era-with-responsibility-and-transparency

www.elsevier.com

Rethinking peer review in the AI era with responsibility and transparency

In a rapidly evolving AI-driven landscape, we explore how AI can support, but why human judgment must remain in the driving seat
Screenshot of email from Elsevier p[publishing: 
What role should AI play in peer review?
"As artificial intelligence continues to reshape research workflows, Elsevier’s latest article explores how AI can support—but never replace—the expert judgment of reviewers and editors.
Hear from Elsevier’s Director of Generative AI, Peer Review Innovation Lead, and Editors-in-Chief as they share perspectives on transparency, ethical safeguards, and the essential role of human oversight in peer review."
Screenshot of email from Elsevier p[publishing: What role should AI play in peer review? "As artificial intelligence continues to reshape research workflows, Elsevier’s latest article explores how AI can support—but never replace—the expert judgment of reviewers and editors. Hear from Elsevier’s Director of Generative AI, Peer Review Innovation Lead, and Editors-in-Chief as they share perspectives on transparency, ethical safeguards, and the essential role of human oversight in peer review."
Screenshot of email from Elsevier p[publishing: What role should AI play in peer review? "As artificial intelligence continues to reshape research workflows, Elsevier’s latest article explores how AI can support—but never replace—the expert judgment of reviewers and editors. Hear from Elsevier’s Director of Generative AI, Peer Review Innovation Lead, and Editors-in-Chief as they share perspectives on transparency, ethical safeguards, and the essential role of human oversight in peer review."
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Mauser II
@wakame@tech.lgbt replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@DrPen Elsevier is just a parasite getting fat on the work of researchers.

Or maybe... "Elsevier could be categorized as organized crime, laundering grant money through a distributed network of researchers."

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.21 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login