Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

Bullets basically bring down planes only when the weight of lead fired exceeds their maximum takeoff weight.
https://weird.autos/@rootwyrm/115344211838414586

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
JdeBP
@JdeBP@mastodon.scot replied  ·  activity timestamp 16 hours ago

@cstross

The shooting down thing seems to have been introduced in translation.

The actual law is aimed at setting up a joint unit to enable the civilian police (with no drone interdiction capabilities) to liaise more closely with the military (that has drone interdiction stuff), which they legally may not at the moment.

The big question for Germans is whether this result of the #RussiaUkraineWar is taking Germany back to a pre-WW2 rôle for the #Bundeswehr.

#GermanPolitics #drones

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
aurorus
@aurorus@chaos.social replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@cstross @rootwyrm I couldn’t find any mention in German news media about actually shooting down drones with firearms. Not counting stupidity like when Bavarian Police shot a catfish [1] other means are used.

[1] https://divernet.com/scuba-news/health-safety/german-police-officer-shoots-giant-catfish/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jon
@oddhack@mstdn.social replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@cstross I am pretty sure Ukraine has brought down a heck of a lot more than four drones with ground fire - there is plenty of video posted. The newer "AI" controlled turrets seem to be helpful though that's more anecdotal AFAICT.

Shooting unarmed drones still poses high risk but when they're carrying warheads the risk/benefit calculation changes a lot.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Isaac Ji Kuo
@isaackuo@spacey.space replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@cstross "Bullets basically bring down planes only when the weight of lead fired exceeds their maximum takeoff weight."

Obviously, the solution is to build anti-aircraft trebuchets that lob massive bullets shaped like cows or trojan rabbits.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Cadbury Moose
@Cadbury_Moose@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@cstross The converse of that is "A new aircraft is not permitted to fly until the weight of the documentation exceeds the weight of the aircraft."

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Reg Braithwaite 🍓
@raganwald@social.bau-ha.us replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@cstross I seem to recall that for anti-aircraft weapons in WWII, the effective solution was to make explosive shells fitted with (top secret) proximity fuses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_fuze

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@raganwald Yeah: the proximity fuze and radars brought down the number of shells needed per kamikaze shot down from roughly 10,000 to less than 500.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dan Sugalski
@wordshaper@weatherishappening.network replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@cstross This is a fact I didn't know but in retrospect doesn't surprise me. It sounds like in the guns vs planes/drones match it's better to just not bother since the guns side is expensive, dangerous to everyone but the plane, and basically pointless. (Might be different for autotargeted guns like the phalanx, but for people with bang-sticks... yeah, no)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.13 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login