Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Richard MacManus
@ricmac@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

I think this is a fair statement, right? #Threads#FakeFediverse

Eli Mallon @iame.li • 55m
Wait wait wait wait wait, new take on this site. Why TF is Threads not listed as an ActivityPub node?
• Kye Fox @kyefox.com • 2h
Goodhart's law: when the measure becomes the target, it ceases to become a good measure.
Centralization is the measure here.
arewedecentralizedyet.online
ATProto is still new. ActivityPub was more centralized by this metric when it was this old.
Are We Decentralized Yet?
A site with statistics regarding the decentralization status of various web services
© arewedecentralizedyet.online
2
1 3
①
Richard MacManus @ricmac.cybercu... • 2m
Because nobody in the fediverse takes
Threads seriously.
企
• •
Eli Mallon @iame.li • 55m Wait wait wait wait wait, new take on this site. Why TF is Threads not listed as an ActivityPub node? • Kye Fox @kyefox.com • 2h Goodhart's law: when the measure becomes the target, it ceases to become a good measure. Centralization is the measure here. arewedecentralizedyet.online ATProto is still new. ActivityPub was more centralized by this metric when it was this old. Are We Decentralized Yet? A site with statistics regarding the decentralization status of various web services © arewedecentralizedyet.online 2 1 3 ① Richard MacManus @ricmac.cybercu... • 2m Because nobody in the fediverse takes Threads seriously. 企 • •
Eli Mallon @iame.li • 55m Wait wait wait wait wait, new take on this site. Why TF is Threads not listed as an ActivityPub node? • Kye Fox @kyefox.com • 2h Goodhart's law: when the measure becomes the target, it ceases to become a good measure. Centralization is the measure here. arewedecentralizedyet.online ATProto is still new. ActivityPub was more centralized by this metric when it was this old. Are We Decentralized Yet? A site with statistics regarding the decentralization status of various web services © arewedecentralizedyet.online 2 1 3 ① Richard MacManus @ricmac.cybercu... • 2m Because nobody in the fediverse takes Threads seriously. 企 • •
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Jake :verified_twtr: :nonazis:
@jakeyounglol@mstdn.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac i think it shouldn’t count because threads federation is very limited. you can see posts from outside users and like and follow, but you can’t comment, repost, or share them
a screenshot of the threads app showing the profile for @bsky.brid.gy@bsky.brid.gy. above the most recent post, there’s an alert sating “Beta - You can like posts from other servers, but you can’t reply to them yet. some posts may not be visible.” on all the posts, the comment, repost, and share buttons are disabled.
a screenshot of the threads app showing the profile for @bsky.brid.gy@bsky.brid.gy. above the most recent post, there’s an alert sating “Beta - You can like posts from other servers, but you can’t reply to them yet. some posts may not be visible.” on all the posts, the comment, repost, and share buttons are disabled.
a screenshot of the threads app showing the profile for @bsky.brid.gy@bsky.brid.gy. above the most recent post, there’s an alert sating “Beta - You can like posts from other servers, but you can’t reply to them yet. some posts may not be visible.” on all the posts, the comment, repost, and share buttons are disabled.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Eugen Rochko
@Gargron@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac Separate: AT Proto is 2 years old now. 2 years after ActivityPub launched was 2020. When ActivityPub was published in 2018, the already decentralized fediverse upgraded to it. The argument in the screenshot does not stand.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Richard MacManus
@ricmac@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@Gargron I hear you. If you try and argue the point on Bluesky, you get called a nerd 🤷
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Eugen Rochko
@Gargron@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac I have observed some of the same simply by having my Mastodon account bridged to it. The interesting thing is that the person in the screenshot has been on the fediverse since at least 2018 and how differently they seem to remember it.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
wakest ⁂
@liaizon@social.wake.st replied  ·  activity timestamp last week
@Gargron @ricmac yeah sorta weird take I was definitely following kyle here in like 2018
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Rob Ricci
@ricci@discuss.systems replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac The real reason is that none of the data sources I've seen count it, so I couldn't even if I wanted to.

I don't know for sure whether they are excluding it on purpose or whether Threads is not exposing this information via the same APIs as most fediverse software.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Rob Ricci
@ricci@discuss.systems replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac followup: it's apparently because threads doesn't expose this information, the best you can do is guess how many have opted in to federation by observing how many threads usernames seem to have showed up in the fediverse. Recent estimates are around 25k
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Coralie Mercier
@koalie@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac yes I think so
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Bruno Philipe
@brunoph@breakpoint.cafe replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac threads is, by the standard used by most fediverse instances, an unmoderated instance; and is positively hostile against queer and trans folks: https://www.wired.com/story/meta-immigration-gender-policies-change/
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jake in the desert
@jake4480@c.im replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago
@ricmac I'm just glad so many instances blocked Threads here. I remember there was so much controversy when it was first announced, but the mods were right to do that, because of what Facebook or Meta or whatever they call themselves this week likes to do, just sucking up all data everywhere. And they'd do it here, they'd make their stuff the main stuff, and then the rest would be lesser. And we don't need more of THAT crap. They're too big and crappy of a company, who needs em
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.2.21 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login