@rysiek
One of the ad talking points I heard is about people talking past each other because they don't see the same news articles as the other side. So in that sense it's a great way to look inside other people's filter bubbles.

Also, you can try out the service without paying for it by just visiting the site and seeing what it says about certain stories you know about. So I'd suggest just doing that. You might not get all the premium features but you can decide if you want that afterwards.

@rysiek The news summaries are “based on an AI-assisted analysis”, which I find stupid for a service specialising in journalism & media criticism¹.

The idea that some random company arbitrarily decides it has more journalistic competence than the thousands of actual educated and experienced journalists it aims to assess seems remarkably arrogant to me.

Ground News act as if every media outlet could easily be assigned one of several categories in the political spectrum from left to right. This necessarily implies the misleading assumption that

a) journalism is inherently biased (a view very popular in the US) and that
b) every newspaper offers only a small range of political opinions.

Ground News offer a solution far too simple to an issue far too complex. This is called populism.