Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

“Rose promptly deleted all their designs from Spreadshirt, closed their account, and emailed Spreadshirt to say they’ll sue if Spreadshirt ever touch their stuff with AI. Spreadshirt thanked Rose for the ‘candid feedback’.

It turns out artists despise AI. They want every AI vendor, particularly Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, fired into the sun. You think you hate AI, talk to an artist.”
https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/115057384865009313

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
maha
@mahadevank@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@urlyman this has happened with every plaftorm - coders had theirs when stackoverflow, a forum for coders, decided to embrace AI. Spreadshirt couldn't care less because a whole lot of folks would continue to use it.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

…Artists have always stolen from other artists. I have done so. In the creative world it’s one facet of what we call ‘inspiration’.

Remixing is what culture does.

The key differences in the era of degenerative LLMs are scale and speed. It’s an accelerant.

It’s a heightening of the mismatch between what capitalism wants and the grain of the internet.

Capitalism profits from controlled scarcity. The internet wants everything connected: engineered abundance

https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/114229879754249257

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dmian 🇪🇺
@dmian@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@urlyman What these models do, and what humans do, is nothing alike. We’re way more complex, and capable of innovation, these models can’t. They do statistical permutations. Feed them Van Gogh, and they can do images that look close to those of Van Gogh. But feed them the painters Van Gogh used as inspiration, and they can't generate something as a new Van Gogh. That’s the main difference. When humans do what these machines do, we’re normally accused of copying, or stealing… 😝

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@dmian I think it’s fuzzy. There are parallels and differences, and they’re not clear cut.

The key thing is that when humans borrow/steal ideas from other humans that’s relational and the relations are complex and, well, human. And the speed that happens at has historically been something that culture can metabolise.

What these models do is *transactional* and in service to degenerate acceleration. In that respect, there’s a lot of overlap with crypto https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/111946915022302081

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dmian 🇪🇺
@dmian@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@urlyman I had to correct my post because I meant "they CAN'T generate", not "they CAN generate". My mistake, sorry... 😝
My point is: these models can't innovate. They can do permutations on what they're fed. But nothing novel comes from them.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@dmian agreed
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Franchesca
@Frantasaur@mastodon.ie replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@urlyman remixing by other artists is also done with intent, nothing like the hyper scale “monkeys with typewriters” style LLMs.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@Frantasaur indeed
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
the roamer
@the_roamer@mastodonapp.uk replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@urlyman

Important thoughts on what genAI / LLMs do to us, thank you.

Love the term "degenerative LLM"!

I'm still looking for the right hashtags to identify this strand of reflection. #noAI#noLLM#antiAI#antiLLM#antiGenAI#degenerativeAI#degenerativeLLM ?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@the_roamer thank you.

I have a few I recycle:

Large Larceny Model
Degenerative AI
Lack of care economy

I may have others I can’t remember rn! I’m a medium-sized excoriation model

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

…We can discern the following probable facets:

‘Creators’ rent degenerate AI from Spreadshirt. The latter will take a cut from all sales they make.

Spreadshirt rent the underlying LLMs from OpenAI or equivalent. The latter take a cut from every ‘token’ generated.

And the whole edifice, including the people buying the shirts, have a token attentiveness to the impacts.

The rentier economy, with both tenants and landlords steadily deconstructing the house they live in

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

…It’s the distance.

The distance between creator and appropriator.

The distance between appropriator and LLM engineer.

The distance between T-shirt manufacturer and printer.

The distance between the price paid for the shirt and its cost.

Connection via the web engineering disconnection at dizzying speed. Serious fucking consequences with barely any attentiveness to consequences

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
JP
@froztbyte@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@urlyman the distance is one part of it, but I also think the “size of the map” is another

we’re now a few years into this bullshit, and we’ve seen many, many, many different kinds of attempts at use of them. including some people in earnest trying to coax novelty from them (something that used to be better when they were “less polished” and more weird/fun as @davidgerard likes to say)

this has a direct implication as an “output cap” - the trash can only ever be _that_ good

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

…I am a part of this. If you think I’m throwing mud, I’m fucking caked in it

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

…It’s not new. It’s just MOOOOOAARRR.

At the time when what we need more than anything else is to learn to be happier with less stuff.

I did loads of T-shirt design in the 80s and 90s. It became a sideline for our Ultimate team. Our shirts were hot property.

When Oz and I started out we were painstakingly making layered acetate artwork on Grant Enlargers.

Then things sped up a bit using Illustrator on a Mac.

And now you can ask an LLM to magic stuff up in seconds

https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/114924149887472459

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
CM Thiede
@cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@urlyman and with all those efficiency gains, costs of those shirts haven't come down. What a deal we all make with the devil of convenience.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.1 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login