Exposure to "AI Assistance" lowers doctors' ability to diagnose cancer just after a few weeks.
"AI"s main effect on people is skill decay.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(25)00133-5/abstract
Exposure to "AI Assistance" lowers doctors' ability to diagnose cancer just after a few weeks.
"AI"s main effect on people is skill decay.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(25)00133-5/abstract
They got dependent on the tool.
Was the AI assistant required by United Health Insurance?
It's the user's responsibility to maintain a quality of work. You don't blame the hammer because the builder took a shortcut.
But... But... But.... If I don't use "AI" how will I ever demolish the environment while churning out mountains of garbage based on stolen content and forgetting how to actually do anything?!?!?!
"I used AI to....", is nothing more than, "Listen I'm not an asshole but....", for the 21st Century.
From 2015: SatNav use degrades map reading ability
What could possibly go wrong...
If I read this correctly, it didn't study whether their overall ability to diagnose was reduced.
“Computer” used to be a job description, and not a machine; the tool obliterated the job, which was fine, because we decided it was better that way.
Do we not want cancer doctors? If we still do, skill decay *at diagnosis* is a very bad outcome.
“Exposure to "AI Assistance" lowers doctors' ability to diagnose cancer just after a few weeks.
"AI"s main effect on people is skill decay”
s/effect/purpose/
Weird that they lost the number of patients in the abstract and not the number of doctors when the thing being tested is the doctors' ability Okay let's go
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate