Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Robert W. Gehl
@rwg@aoir.social  ·  activity timestamp last month

The latest FOSS Academic post involves more wrestling with the implications of #generativeAI for academic peer review:

https://fossacademic.tech/2025/08/06/reviewing-ai.html

In this post, I take observations from software #developers and #openSource podcasters (such as the folks at @latenightlinux ) about how genAI is swamping things like bug bounties and code reviews. This is similar to some of the issues faced by academic peer reviewers.

#academicchatter#FOSSacademic

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras
@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month
@rwg I think the approach that wikipedia has recently implemented for the most egregious use of generative "AI", speed deletions, is the right approach: if the authors couldn't be bothered to write their paper, why should anyone bother reading, let alone reviewing it?
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.2.21 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login