So uh, it appears the US constitution's official version on constitution.congress.gov has whole sections removed from it: https://slrpnk.net/post/25696399
Amongst others being the removal of the section saying "habeas corpus shall not be suspended"
So uh, it appears the US constitution's official version on constitution.congress.gov has whole sections removed from it: https://slrpnk.net/post/25696399
Amongst others being the removal of the section saying "habeas corpus shall not be suspended"
Uh, this claim is easily disproven by just searching "habeas corpus shall not be suspended" and it's still very much there. I can't add a screenshot, but if you go to this link I think it'll work:
https://constitution.congress.gov/search/habeas%20corpus%20shall
His Supreme Imperious Excellency would be most pleased if these changes were not questioned, just accepted by all.
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."
"The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."
They seem to have fixed it
https://bsky.app/profile/librarycongress.bsky.social/post/3lvqilhwb6k2x
At least in the non-annotated "Full Text" version at https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
(As well as the part that gives the federal goverment juristiction over Washington DC.)
Thanks for alerting us to this. After verifying it, I have emailed my rep in congress, to see what they know and can do about it.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Look at the parts of the constitution they already are ignoring and then look at what they erased and tell me with a straight face you think this is an accident. I guess maybe you are still at the denial phase here, but catch up. There are masked fascists kidnapping people and sending them to concentration camps where they are being fed maggots. That started a few months ago, so you've had time to pick up on this by now.
You are legitimately stupid if you think fasism cares about whether or not what they do is legitimized by a primary source document. They will simply say this is the way it's always been, the other copies are counterfeit and treasonous and proceed logically from there. Trump has already done that with what was left of a free media, why would he not do that with the foundational document of this country when it contradicts him? At the end of the day, if he says it and the military gets behind it, that is effectively the law that will matter to our lives.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/
for reference: here's the wayback machine's version from January.
https://web.archive.org/web/20250118140540/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1
So uh... Guess we're headed to Orwell, not Huxley. Fuck.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C2-1/ALDE_00001087/
wayback from January:
uspol, severely alarming
Here's the Archive's website on it: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution
I'm hoping in vain this is a mistake, but given TX R's attempt to gerrymander the next nat'l election, and the response from several Blue states saying they'll do the same in response... the timing is a bit odd.
This is what I'm saying! One of the most reproduced documents in the country. I have my own copy. What do they think they are trying to pull?
I haven't seen any major news articles about this, but you can see for yourself. Journalists where you at, who's gonna write the first piece
But I did check, and it was indeed removed.
Here's a news article covering it, thx @billseitzhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/did-congress-official-constitution-site-just-delete-references-to-parts-of-article-1/ar-AA1K0QFb
BTW why put the "question" thing up there, just answer the question, yes it was
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate