@fehrtrade This legislation has absolutely no place in a modern British society and should never have been passed without serious amendments. There are a myriad of emergencies and services in crisis which politicians must prioritise in the #UK because of over a decade of serious incompetence and neglect but instead they have rushed through a set of laws on a topic which they demonstrably cannot possibly understand, even at the most basic of levels
@fehrtrade
It's too confusing. Somehow protecting children became (as it always does) some kind of government surveillance thing which at the same time really annoys the porn industry.

I don't like the government surveillance or the porn industry. In equal measure. It's quite possible to loathe both.

One thing I'm certain of is that children are, again, being used as a shoehorn for other agenda. I'm not joining in.

@fehrtrade
lmfao
>The act requires platforms, including end-to-end encrypted messengers, to scan for child pornography, despite warnings from experts that it is not possible to implement such a scanning mechanism without undermining users' privacy.[6] The government has said that it does not intend to enforce this provision of the act until it becomes technically feasible to do so.

src: wikipedia

when this becomes feasible, world will have other problems