I may be having too much fun with this...
maybe some stuff on https://stroudcommons.org/learn/ is useful? it has a video! (the embed doesn't start at the beginning, I think their mistake...). I didn't watch the video.
I think it's ok if people come and go without intellectually knowing it's "the commons" is fine too, the experience of being in a commons teaches a lot in an embodied/intuitive way.
I guess all the people in the Ostrom studies didn't call their fishing lake a commons? It was just their fishing lake and obviously common!
Sure, not everyone needs to hear about it, but people that want to build alternatives to <world we live in> can totally gain from it. And that is more or less everyone passing though here.
Embodied is good, but we do periodically get ideological resistance: why all these rules and structures? Can't we all just get along?
So my motivation is to increase internal coherence and cooperation + politically empower people going forward.
I'm quite skeptical of "simple explanations of the new ways" to achieve much transformation,...
... *but* given at kanthaus they can experience the practise too, maybe that's a great combo, theory and practise together.
(I, and many others, love theory in any case)
Also: I want to make the claim that
> Community X Institution = Commons
because I find that a really useful way to think about it. Anyone got a source/opinion to confirm/oppose it?
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate