i am happy to change the wording - but i'd like to understand if we are talking about a misunderstanding here.

I am using the word "user" in the sense of me being a mastodon user. Its meant to be neutral, but if you have a better sugfestion, i can adapt 🙂

The word "self sovereign identity" comes from the understanding that in a democracy "the sovereign" are the people.

But whether democracy or social networks in all shapes... the foundation are sovereign ppl

i am happy to change the wording - but i'd like to understand if we are talking about a misunderstanding here.

I am using the word "user" in the sense of me being a mastodon user. Its meant to be neutral, but if you have a better sugfestion, i can adapt 🙂

The word "self sovereign identity" comes from the understanding that in a democracy "the sovereign" are the people.

But whether democracy or social networks in all shapes... the foundation are sovereign ppl

This is both true and a #geekproblem deadened, we need fewer dead-ends in this #openweb reboot, please.

How would the code you are writing fit DIRECTLY into #makeinghistory and #indymediaback

PS my keyboard as stopped working so likely missing letters :)

That's all good and true, but we are social creatures so where are the relationships if everyone can be a technical individual this is food for though for the #geekproblem

And is why the #indymediaback project is a path out of this :)

there is media everywhere.
X, truthsocial, mastodon, bsky, nostr, print, its as diverse as humanity. dat allows public - in spirit "rss/atom feed style" news... uncensorable and with sovereign and if needed anonymous publishers. dat was made for open data and open science and ...whether its compatible with AP or At protocol? ..you can always bridge everything, the way you can follow mastodon folks on nostr too

But key in p2p is self sovereign users/journalists