Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Strypey
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago

For now, the only alternative to using BlueSky as your ATProto identity provider is to BYOD (Bring Your Own Domain, using did:web).

The fundamental problem with using a domain name as a social identity, is that it's like having to pay every year to keep your passport working. If you can't afford to pay every time your domain name comes up for renewal, you lose the ability to identify yourself on every service where you BYOD.

So only geeks who have domains anyway will do it.

(1/?)

#DNS#BYOD

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Ryan Bolger
Ryan Bolger
@rmbolger@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago
@strypey Isn’t there an in between option that DDNS providers (afraid.org, DuckDNS, etc) could fill? For those who don’t want to pay for their own domain but want something more unique than the default bsky domain?
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Strypey
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago
@rmbolger
> Isn’t there an in between option that DDNS providers (afraid.org, DuckDNS, etc) could fill?

Intriguing suggestion, but I suspect this is both more difficult to use, and more fragile. A domain name can at least be moved between registrars. I haven't tried to use DDNS (given I'm an aging geek this speaks volumes), so I don't know how persistent identifiers are across DDNS providers.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ryan Bolger
Ryan Bolger
@rmbolger@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago
@strypey I mean, if you want a portable namespace, you have to own it. There’s no getting around that. But I’m sure there are plenty of people who have been running their own little web presence for years on a DDNS provider’s subdomain. Tying a social identity to that same namespace would be a piece of cake. Even easier if the provider implements explicit support for _atproto TXT records. Many already have some level of API support for ACME cert TXT records.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Strypey
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago
@rmbolger
> if you want a portable namespace, you have to own it

... so DNS is not the way to do it, as it's currently administrated, because domain names can only be leased. If we're going to use them for persistent personal identity, we need to fix that.

> a piece of cake

... and ...

> if the provider implements explicit support for _atproto TXT records. Many already have some level of API support for ACME cert TXT records

... do not belong in the same paragraph ; )

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Andy Linton :tinoflag: ✅
Andy Linton :tinoflag: ✅
@artnacrea@mastodon.ie replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago
@strypey Compared with the cost of owning/renting the hardware needed to access the internet (phone, tablet, laptop, server etc) plus the cost of broadband and/or mobile connection the cost of a domain name seems relatively modest. And the alternatives mean that some sort of big tech "owns" you in some way.

I suspect the tech hurdles are more significant.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Strypey
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago

Just over a year ago, I proposed that the same government departments that issue ID documents like birth certificates and passports, could provide a digital equivalent. In the form of a domain using the name on their birth certificate (eg myname.id.nz). Costing only a one-off issuing fee;

https://disintermedia.substack.com/p/a-free-online-birth-certificate

As I acknowledged in the piece, that would only address use cases where people want to attach their online activities to their real world identity. What about pseudonymous ID?

(2/?)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
mike805
mike805
@mike805@noc.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago
@strypey The government could probably issue everyone a Yuibkey for a lot less than the current cost of fraud.

The problem is once everyone had such a device, it would be required everywhere, and would create even more of a surveillance society. This sort of universal ID has been proposed over and over, and always failed on those grounds.

Plus the spies and politicians need the ID system to not be totally airtight, since they depend on getting around it!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Strypey
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 7 months ago

Maybe my thinking is still too centralised here. Rather than trying to establish a central ID guarantor ("One ring to Rule them all"), we could make use of something like "rel me" to cross-link our identities on different services;

https://indieweb.org/rel-me

In such a way that searching for an email (or AP or Matrix) address on an unrelated platform, would return any account on that platform with a "rel me" link to the address I searched.

It'd need good UX design though.

(3/3)

#FediverseIdeas

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.27 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct