Introducing the Open Science Network 馃敩
We're thrilled to be part of this initiative dedicated to building open and federated digital spaces to push the boundaries of open science and scholarly communication.
馃敆 Explore more on the website: https://openscience.network
馃摙 Dive into the details in our announcement blog post: https://bonfirenetworks.org/posts/openscience_network/
@brembs @UlrikeHahn @jorge @open_science@a.gup.pe
#openscience
@bonfire @brembs @UlrikeHahn @jorge @open_science
Oh, I almost believed you. Then I found out your source code is on GitHub. Sorry, but if you are serious about your mission of openness, you are on Codeberg or Sourcehut.
@bonfire @brembs @UlrikeHahn @jorge @open_science
Seems like you're trying to do similar things than https://scholar.nexus/ ?
@bonfire this looks great and very promising! some of us at neuromatch.social #neuromatchstodon are definitely interested in joining as a pilot community. we'll be in touch!
@bonfire I'm into it. 馃憤
Going by the website, it looks like ORCID itself isn't (yet?) officially involved with this project. I'm guessing you're using their API.
I've recently been thinking about a potential project to make ORCID records ActivityPub-followable, to keep up to date about colleagues who don't personally use the fediverse yet. Does that sound interesting? Are there ethical concerns? There used to be at least one ORCID-to-RSS service but it's been dead for a while.
