Post by @bonfire@indieweb.social

Introducing the Open Science Network 🔬
We're thrilled to be part of this initiative dedicated to building open and federated digital spaces to push the boundaries of open science and scholarly communication.
🔗 Explore more on the website: https://openscience.network
📢 Dive into the details in our announcement blog post: https://bonfirenetworks.org/posts/openscience_network/

@brembs @UlrikeHahn @jorge @open_science@a.gup.pe
#openscience

#openscience

1 Boost

0 Likes

qeef

@qeef@en.osm.town 3 yr. ago

@bonfire @brembs @UlrikeHahn @jorge @open_science

Oh, I almost believed you. Then I found out your source code is on GitHub. Sorry, but if you are serious about your mission of openness, you are on Codeberg or Sourcehut.

The Viking

@GunnarBlohm@neuromatch.social 3 yr. ago

@bonfire @brembs @UlrikeHahn @jorge @open_science

Seems like you're trying to do similar things than https://scholar.nexus/ ?

marcelcosta

@marcelcosta@bcn.fedi.cat 3 yr. ago

@bonfire @jorge Hey! This looks very interesting! I have joined as an opencollective supporter (not much, but stable).

I'll be waiting for some initial pilot 😊

manisha

@manisha@neuromatch.social 3 yr. ago

@bonfire this looks great and very promising! some of us at neuromatch.social #neuromatchstodon are definitely interested in joining as a pilot community. we'll be in touch!

Julian Fietkau

@julian@fietkau.social 3 yr. ago

@bonfire I'm into it. 👍

Going by the website, it looks like ORCID itself isn't (yet?) officially involved with this project. I'm guessing you're using their API.

I've recently been thinking about a potential project to make ORCID records ActivityPub-followable, to keep up to date about colleagues who don't personally use the fediverse yet. Does that sound interesting? Are there ethical concerns? There used to be at least one ORCID-to-RSS service but it's been dead for a while.