#Tag
ICYMI: Our spotlight on Indonesia
A thriving publishing ecosystem, DOI adoption, strong sponsorship networks, and growing engagement in #metadata quality.
Read the full story: https://doi.org/10.64000/ww92x-8wp52
#scholarlypublishing #Crossref #Indonesia
With nearly 20,000 journals using OJS, a strong national publishing culture, and DOI requirements for indexing in SINTA, Indonesian institutions are connecting research to the global scholarly record at scale.
More on the blog: https://doi.org/10.64000/ww92x-8wp52
#scholarlypublishing #Crossref #Indonesia
Connaître les fondamentaux du droit d'auteur sur les publis scientifiques dans le contexte de la SO : nouvelle fiche pratique du GTSO juridique de Couperin : https://gtso.couperin.org/non-classe/fiche-le-droit-dauteur-et-la-science-ouverte/ #copyright #openscience #scholarlypublishing
Connaître les fondamentaux du droit d'auteur sur les publis scientifiques dans le contexte de la SO : nouvelle fiche pratique du GTSO juridique de Couperin : https://gtso.couperin.org/non-classe/fiche-le-droit-dauteur-et-la-science-ouverte/ #copyright #openscience #scholarlypublishing
I would appreciate recommendations for a preprint server to submit preprints in computational intelligence / computational cognitive science.
I know about the following preprint servers and would appreciate opinions about their relative merits for that topic area, and links to any other relevant preprint servers.
* https://arxiv.org/
- The available fine-grained categories in Computer Science *might* not cover my topics (depending on how strictly the categories are interpreted).
- The submission formats *might* be incompatible with my writing workflow.
* https://osf.io/preprints/discover
- OSF Preprints is a network of community-run OSF-hosted preprint servers. The only vaguely relevant community server is PssyArXiv, and it isn't clear that my topics of interest are on-scope for PsyArXiv.
* https://zenodo.org/
- Appears to have no constraints on format or topic (which is probably positive for me).
- Is not indexed by Google Scholar. (I have views about Google. However, not being indexed by Google means that preprints on Zenodo are effectively invisible to many researchers.)
#FediHelp #PrePrint #ScholarlyPublishing #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #CogSci #CognitiveScience #CompCogSci #ComputationalCognitiveScience #ComputationalIntelligence #MathematicalPsychology #MathPsych
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration
Reformation of science publishing: the Stockholm Declaration
Diamond #OpenAccess academic publishers want to ensure their journals meet established technical standards & requirements - to be professional and in line with #FAIR principles. CRAFT-OA training materials can help.
Learn more: https://www.craft-oa.eu/trainings-workshops/
#DiamondOA #DiamondOpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #AcademicPublishing
Eine Gruppe internationaler Forscher warnt in der "Stockholm Declaration" vor dem Zusammenbruch des Wissenfundaments moderner Gesellschaften – und fordert eine weltweite Reform des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens.
https://www.jmwiarda.de/blog/2025/11/05/die-groesste-wissenschaftliche-krise-aller-zeiten
Eine Gruppe internationaler Forscher warnt in der "Stockholm Declaration" vor dem Zusammenbruch des Wissenfundaments moderner Gesellschaften – und fordert eine weltweite Reform des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens.
https://www.jmwiarda.de/blog/2025/11/05/die-groesste-wissenschaftliche-krise-aller-zeiten
Today's email to an academic associate editor, declining to review for a big corporate publisher. This one focuses on Nature Publishing Group's practice of funneling rejected manuscripts to their newer journals with hefty APCs. #scholarlyPublishing
Today's email to an academic associate editor, declining to review for a big corporate publisher. This one focuses on Nature Publishing Group's practice of funneling rejected manuscripts to their newer journals with hefty APCs. #scholarlyPublishing
A few people have asked my advice on this recently so I’m sharing here in case it’s useful:
If it helps, I agonised about this in my role as a literary executor (cared much less about my own work) and reached the conclusion that diffusion of the ideas is best served by being incorporated into training. I wouldn’t expect everyone to reach the same conclusion but I hope it’s useful to make these suggestions about factors to consider.
#intellectualProperty #LLMs #postTraining #publishing #scholarlyPublishing #Training #visibility
![Dear Dr. [redacted],
It was nice to meet you at [redacted]!
Thanks for thinking of me as a possible reviewer, as I am interested in the topic. However, I decline to review this manuscript - I often do this in the case of journals published by profiteering corporate publishers. For Nature Communications, Nature Publishing Group charges an outrageous US$6990 to authors that has little to do with higher-quality service or journal processes and lots to do with a legacy first-mover advantage that it uses to exploit academia. This is rentier capitalism.
NPG funnels papers they reject from their most prestigious outlets to their newer subsidiary journals such as Nature Communications and Nature Communications Psychology, which academics go along with because they don’t (directly) foot the bill, and because, given the pressure academics are under to publish rapidly, they wish to take advantage of the reviews they may have already received from the higher-tier Nature journal. Because we are now live in a world where most studies can eventually be published somewhere, NPG has been able to exploit this by creating their own lower-tier journals and charging high-aspiration authors for the convenience.
This practice conflicts with my interest in universities and funders not wasting their money,](https://fediscience.org/system/media_attachments/files/115/399/291/273/527/191/original/c5cd354afe43e51c.png)
