Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Ulrike Hahn
Ulrike Hahn boosted
Till Grallert
@tillgrallert@digitalcourage.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago
@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons @dingemansemark

This is getting worse by the minute. I followed @christof|s hint concerning the reproduction of articles from #DHQ / @DHQuarterly looking for one of my own papers (https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/16/2/000593/000593.html).

In this case #ProQuest blatantly violates the CC BY-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) by

- not mentioning the license
- producing a derivative
- not linking to the original

I am very much in favour of @adho.org, as the publisher of @DHQuarterly, follows the path outlined by @dingemansemark. I will also log a complaint with #ProQuest through my employer.

#AcademicPublishing#Licensing#Piracy#PlatformCapitalism#PredatoryPublishing

Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Till Grallert
@tillgrallert@digitalcourage.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago
@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons

After reading through the CC BY license I am none the wiser whether one has to clearly indicate that the material in question had been originally published somewhere else. The DOI as provided by #ProQuest reveals this fact but only after manually parsing the string with a resolver. Readers unfamiliar with the Programming Historian are made to believe that ProQuest is the original publisher or the platform officially hosting the original content.

However, ProQuest clearly violates the attribution requirements by modifying the layout and removing images. The CC BY license explicitly states that “You must […] indicate if You modified the Licensed Material”.

#AcademicPublishing#PredatoryPublishing#OpenLicenses#CreativeCommons#DigitalHumanities

Till Grallert
@tillgrallert@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago
@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons @dingemansemark

This is getting worse by the minute. I followed @christof|s hint concerning the reproduction of articles from #DHQ / @DHQuarterly looking for one of my own papers (https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/16/2/000593/000593.html).

In this case #ProQuest blatantly violates the CC BY-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) by

- not mentioning the license
- producing a derivative
- not linking to the original

I am very much in favour of @adho.org, as the publisher of @DHQuarterly, follows the path outlined by @dingemansemark. I will also log a complaint with #ProQuest through my employer.

#AcademicPublishing#Licensing#Piracy#PlatformCapitalism#PredatoryPublishing

Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Till Grallert
@tillgrallert@digitalcourage.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago
@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons @dingemansemark

This is getting worse by the minute. I followed @christof|s hint concerning the reproduction of articles from #DHQ / @DHQuarterly looking for one of my own papers (https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/16/2/000593/000593.html).

In this case #ProQuest blatantly violates the CC BY-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) by

- not mentioning the license
- producing a derivative
- not linking to the original

I am very much in favour of @adho.org, as the publisher of @DHQuarterly, follows the path outlined by @dingemansemark. I will also log a complaint with #ProQuest through my employer.

#AcademicPublishing#Licensing#Piracy#PlatformCapitalism#PredatoryPublishing

Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
Screenshot of a paper originally published in Digital Humanities Quarterly as pirated by ProQuest displaying bibliographic information in a horizontal bar on the top and the content with some paratext in vertical columns. The image shows that ProQuest does not provide a link to the original and violates the CC BY-ND license by producing a derivative.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Till Grallert
@tillgrallert@digitalcourage.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago
@christof @ElenLeFoll @proghist @creativecommons

After reading through the CC BY license I am none the wiser whether one has to clearly indicate that the material in question had been originally published somewhere else. The DOI as provided by #ProQuest reveals this fact but only after manually parsing the string with a resolver. Readers unfamiliar with the Programming Historian are made to believe that ProQuest is the original publisher or the platform officially hosting the original content.

However, ProQuest clearly violates the attribution requirements by modifying the layout and removing images. The CC BY license explicitly states that “You must […] indicate if You modified the Licensed Material”.

#AcademicPublishing#PredatoryPublishing#OpenLicenses#CreativeCommons#DigitalHumanities

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.1 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login