@andrewrk congrats and good luck with the move :)
Sorry, you cannot view this.
It may have been deleted, or you may not have permission to see it.
@andrewrk
I'm really tempted to learn zig, side from technicalities, just for how good your ideas are! But I guess it's too much for me
@andrewrk Congratulations for the move! 🎉
I hope Codeberg will be a better host for the project in the future.
@andrewrk The first paragraph was brutal and I sincerely hope it ages like fine wine such that you guys won't catch some flak for that by potential donors. With that being said, thank you for moving off of GH, I hope it inspires many more to do the same.
zig + codeberg = zoidberg
@andrewrk Perhaps the metaphorical "copy-on-write" of issues and PRs warrants a bit of a clearer description of the process you have in mind?
In case we want to comment on something that is already open on GitHub, how do we do that? Do we open a new issue/PR on Codeberg, copy-paste the title, put something like "cont'd from <github_link>" in the description and continue on Codeberg like that?
@andrewrk I really like your work.
I wanted to reach out , I'm currently building my own platform and I wanted to gather all the help I can get from others , I hope u don't mind helping me .
@andrewrk PSA: Codeberg currently does not implement accessible account registration. It is impossible for screen reader users to make a Codeberg account due to the image-only captcha. There's a manual fallback path, but no idea how long that takes. I've been forced to use the Wikimedia one, and that was about 3 months. This has been pointed out to them many times, and it's seemingly not something they're prioritizing.
@andrewrk
They are only required because governments fail in their duty of care and obligation to safeguard the people it serves, on account of serving the few who have the power to re-elect or dispose of them.
@andrewrk Love the whole vibe and migration off github, but calling people monkeys and losers is disappointing
@andrewrk good post, small suggestion. The GitHub repo now links to the blog post in the URL field and the README, but the blog post doesn't appear to have a clear link to the new Codeberg repo. I'd suggest adding one early in the post and perhaps changing the destination of the link in the GitHub README so that folks landing on the post or old repo can find their way to the new one easily.
@andrewrk Moved my donation to Every.org, keep up the good work
