Discussion
Loading...

Discussion

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Real Syntactic
@mirijb2@c18.masto.host  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

The Globe and Mail’s Andre Picard on the Canadian Parliamentary committee on academic research and funding and its demands for a database of disagregated personal details on Canadian academic researchers and peer reviewers—against privacy rules and in pursuit of an anti-EDI agenda. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/gift/cbb4da2ef035e66b62948e2204205824a6d8457e87520f19f27beafc15828f34/ETWOFKPB7NGPPBFFEGKRNIBLAU/ #highered

The Globe and Mail

How much are MPs entitled to know about research grants? Not as much as they think

A parliamentary committee is asking for academics’ private information on a strange anti-DEI crusade
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Real Syntactic
@mirijb2@c18.masto.host replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

Here are the relevant passages from the Committee’s minutes of proceedings. It looks to me like a right wing EDI-focused data mining operation wrapped in a veil of innuendo. I understand, which may not be correct, that the scene followed questioning of at least one research council president involving the reading out of individual project titles and researcher names, to guffaws. Certainly this has happened in Parliament many times, particularly on results day. https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/SRSR/meeting-6/minutes #highered

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login