This thread has taken too much of my time & energy, and I'm shifting that to elsewhere. I've preserved the thread here: ghostarchive.org/archive/JfGbx

Feel free to stop reblogging. I still would like to see pixelfed actually publish the vulnerability report on GitHub, and fix the issue with followings on pixelfed being out of sync with remote accounts due to this bug, but whatever.

@thisismissem One of the biggest problems, in my humble opinion, is the over promise under deliver. We constantly see toots telling us what is coming, or giving dates, and it doesn't appear. I have lost count of the number of these toots that are then deleted at a later date. I did keep a copy of a toot that was posed by Dan a few weeks ago in which he promised to stop over-promising. It was deleted about an hour later.

Dan the Dev is too thinly spread. He has great talent, but works on far too much. The result is that things suffer. Projects and promises lapse. People get frustrated. Tempers flare. Dan gets pissed off, understandably. Then come the churlish toots

One could argue that we have no right to dictate his workload. However, he's putting out a product (products maybe?) and it comes with responsibility and expectations from the 110k active users. And what about the people who gave up their hard earned cash to fund over $100k to his projects. What was the plan there? I've never seen any firm strategy. Where's the crowdfunding being used?

People want to help him. I have offered several times over the years. I have a list of crap UI issues. I've offered/suggested that he needs to test stuff before launch. If he has a test group, it's not working .... and it can't be your friends! Testing is a thorough and serious aspect of software dev. It's not happening here.

He's hinted at a new team. He has been asked to introduce this team. I'ts never happened that I have seen, and the messages go unacknowledged.

No one really wants to see Pixelfed fail (well there are probably some), but on the whole I think we all want this to work. It's the makings of a great product.

Important issues, like the one raised here in the original toot can't go unfixed and ignored. The point of the fedi is to be open (and supportive), trusting, and honest with user data.

@daj @thisismissem

There's a general anti-pattern to many #FOSS projects, which I call the "One Man Army", where over time - as the popularity of a project steadily grows - just coding isn't enough and more and more additional aspects of the Free software development lifecycle, the #FSDL, must be addressed in order for the project to remain sustainable. Pixelfed at the time was my inspiration to coin the anti-pattern:

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/113874718620285261

@thisismissem @pixelfed The fix was shipped and announced in March.

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/114215925957179498

I'm working on collection sync, but that is a Mastodon extension that isn't supported in most software keep in mind.

Maybe you could have reached out privately instead of publicly shaming an open source fediverse project into implementing a Mastodon-only fix.

We do accept PRs, and you could have contributed a fix to help ship sync quicker if you did really care (adonis is based on laravel, php is ez)

Re: So @pixelfed still hasn't fully acknowledged nor fixed the security vulnerability from earlier this year, despite multiple people asking for updates over the past ~6 months.

@thisismissem@hachyderm.io what was this in reference to, the one where Pixelfed allows anyone on a server access to a followers only post if one person on that server is a follower?
@gelbphoenix @dansup@deadsuperhero here's what a published one looks like: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-54879

Notice how it links back to the published security vulnerability report on Mastodon? Notice how the vulnerability for Pixelfed doesn't?

Here's the same for the only published advisory for Pixelfed: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-25108

@hiphopheaven @pixelfed I'm not saying "don't use Pixelfed", no, in fact I want people to be safe using and federating with Pixelfed.

However, I am calling on Dan & the pixelfed team (?) to do the right thing and fully fix this vulnerability, and do the remediation work necessary, and adopt better security release practices.

Having this in a state of "kinda fixed" for 6 months or so isn't great.

@thisismissem hello Emelia. just read this all now and wondering if you recommend leaving pixelfed?

thank u for providing detail as to what the issue is about for this designer to understand what the major concerns are.

I don't know how he treats contributors but also haven't posted anything there for weeks so unsure if I shall keep my account alive knowing this now. Thank you in advance!

Would you also have other recommendations of other pixelfed-like solutions or is it simpler to just post pix directly on one's account here on Fedi from the server I am part of? Thanks again!