@strypey

That last paragraph is actually the most potent argument I have seen against #vibecode in #FOSS

And I speak as a vibecode practitioner.

As to pluralistic.
I have huge respect for his past work, but I think he, like many who don't actually use AI is way off the mark and increasingly drifting further off it as the tech advances.
His "reverse centaur" is just laughable (to me) and "asbestos in the walls" assumes a world of Butlerian Jihad and that IMHo is higly improbable.
But as well as an activist he is also an author and no once can accuse him of not working to satisfy his audience.

Its a bit, like a vegetarian writing about steak cuisine.

But, thanks for curating FOSS, it's a rarely appreciated duty.

(2/2)

@n_dimension
> If you don't know if the software is made by machine. Can you still tell?

That's more like 'if a tree falls in the forest ..." than Ship of Theseus. Vibe coding is more like a ship vaguely like Theseus', built by a bunch of people who have seen lots of ships, but have no experience with boatbuilding ; )