Discussion
Loading...

Discussion

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp last week

I forgot to share the #mTurk data quality result that got scooped:

“In late 2020…. Participants from the United States were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk, - #CloudResearch, #Prolific, and a #university. One participant source yielded up to 18 times as many low-quality respondents as the other three.”

https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaf015

#psychology #philosophy #surveyMethods #quantMethods #dataScience #qualityControl

Figure 1b. Number of observations per sample,
before and after filtering for data quality (N = 460).
Figure 1b. Number of observations per sample, before and after filtering for data quality (N = 460).
Figure 1b. Number of observations per sample, before and after filtering for data quality (N = 460).

Reflection-philosophy order effects and correlations across samples

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

I forgot to share the #mTurk data quality result that got scooped:

“In late 2020…. Participants from the United States were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk, - #CloudResearch, #Prolific, and a #university. One participant source yielded up to 18 times as many low-quality respondents as the other three.”

https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaf015

#psychology #philosophy #surveyMethods #quantMethods #dataScience #qualityControl

Figure 1b. Number of observations per sample,
before and after filtering for data quality (N = 460).
Figure 1b. Number of observations per sample, before and after filtering for data quality (N = 460).
Figure 1b. Number of observations per sample, before and after filtering for data quality (N = 460).

Reflection-philosophy order effects and correlations across samples

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

We've found recruiting people for online #research via #onlineAdvertising yielded good results on overt and covert #dataQuality measures (perhaps because participation incentives aren't financial):

Attention checks passed ≅ 2.6 out of 3

ReCAPTCHA (v3) ≅ 0.94 out of 1.0

Sample size > 5000 (from six continents)

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412525000198

#surveyMethods #cogSci #psychology #xPhi #QualityControl #econ #marketing

Analytic atheism and analytic apostasy across cultures

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tom Stafford
Tom Stafford
@tomstafford@mastodon.online replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@ByrdNick interesting. I love the idea of giving participant non-financial incentives in return for their participation/data. Much more of a partnership model. Harder to do, required more thought, but great to see if yields data quality (which is sure to drop only further https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/faking-survey-responses-with-llms )

Faking survey responses with LLMs

Survey research is a key mechanism by which society knows itself, we should all be worried if can't be trusted.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct