@tanavit @HighlandLawyer @bloodravenlib @pluralistic
Similarly, in the US, we have "contracts of adhesion." I'm hopeful these mandatory arbitration clauses will be found invalid eventually.
To qualify as a contract of adhesion:
(1) more powerful party determines the terms
(2) terms cannot be avoided by parties with less power (e.g., consumers cannot avoid mandatory arbitration if they want a CREDIT CARD)
(3) the process itself or the terms are unconscionable (i.e., contrary to good conscience; only agreed to because the weaker party had no option but to accept the terms if they wanted the product or service)
⭐ You'll often see a special carve-out for arbitration clauses ("if this clause is held unenforceable the rest of the agreement is still enforceable").
They do this because they know it is only a matter of time . . . !