Here's a pattern that keeps happening:
1. Malignant actors within or entering a community cause problems for some of the people there.
2. The victims talk about it, because they need to, and have a right to. Sometimes they put up practical boundaries to defend themselves. They certainly make it clear who's victimizing them.
3. The original malignant actors pull a DARVO and accuse their own victims of "dividing the community."
This depends entirely on a credulous public, or at least that community having room for a credulous mainstream inside of it. If you have any context, if you read any of the victims' accounts, the sham is clear for what it is. But the flow of information on the internet can be like one of the big plague cities during the industrial revolution: there's always more people just showing up with no immune response.
I could have posted this any time in the last decade and it would apply to a different thing, but today I'm thinking about some bad takes I've seen about Codeberg.