It gets better and better...
No, not better, that other thing.
> parties will turn to AI to predict what the outcome is likely to be. 'As they are both advised of these outcomes, the parties will feel economic pressure to settle at the level predicted by the machine rather than waiting for a decision'.
@neil what I was originally going to say was, "oh dear, did someone let Vos out again?" but actually he's got a point. Arbitration is basically whatever parties agree it to be, and given that any kind of litigation or litigation-like process is basically just a massive throw of the dice *anyway*, it seems entirely plausible that parties to an arbitration would think "well, we can spend five million pounds on a conventional arbitration and take our chances on the arbitrator understanding the case properly and taking proper account of the evidence, or we can let a glorified Magic 8 Ball do it for a tiny fraction of that, and we still just take our chances".