"Unfortunately this "expert slop", where expert is a self-perceived title, carries a corporate framing that damages interactions. Others become, at best, fungible coworkers, and, at worst, annoying speed bumps in the race to 100% completion of any software interest the expert has. No more mentoring, debating, flame wars. "Progress" is the only goal. The line must go up."
(Article title: LLM Policies: Progress At All Costs)
https://diegoe.be/2026/09/25/llm-policies-progress-at-all-costs/
@tante Some people are just refusing to accept that AI can be used as more than a productivity tool but rather something that can enable amateurs to quickly achieve professional quality work while COLLABORATING with others. And that for me is intellectually disonest. Have you asked people who collaborate and share prompts, workflows in subreddits if they believe that what they are doing is just for productivity's sake? I hate this kind of snobbery and I believe it's intelellectualy disonest. I don't even have patience to deal with this stance, after spending my working days trying to reach the most professional level of quality while using two or three LLMs, just to improve the quality of my work as a technical writer from what it was previously possible. And that's also why I find these kinds of posts offensive to me.