Critical ecosystems are at risk of collapsing (1)
If current rates of biodiversity loss continue, every critical ecosystem is on
a pathway to collapse.
An ecosystem collapses when it passes beyond a critical threshold or tipping point, after
which it can no longer maintain essential functions or structure, leading to extensive shifts to
its size and composition. The ecosystem transitions irreversibly from one stable state to another.
For instance, the Amazon basin collapse would see it shifting to a drier savannah state.
Collapse impairs an ecosystem’s ability to provide vital services including clean water, food
production, and climate regulation. This could accelerate climate change and biodiversity loss
and have catastrophic implications, including the collapse of major food sources and fundamental
changes to global weather patterns and the water cycle.
As biodiversity loss and degradation continue, impacts become more severe and the
likelihood of ecosystems collapsing increases. It is likely that ecosystem collapses would
happen concurrently given their shared drivers and feedback loops.
There is a high degree of uncertainty around the timing and pathways of ecosystem collapse.
The drivers of ecosystem degradation are approaching the known thresholds for collapse -
for example, the Amazon is likely to collapse at 20-25% deforestation when combined with
temperature rises and forest fires; it is currently at 17%. 9-13 But the thresholds for collapse could be
higher or lower than the science has been able to identify: we could be closer to, or further away
from, the thresholds than we think; and there could be additional thresholds that we do not know
about yet. There is a realistic possibility that trends to date mean we have unknowingly crossed
thresholds already and irreversible collapse of some ecosystems is inevitable (for example coral
reefs), though we may not see the impacts for several years.
There is a realistic possibility some ecosystems start to collapse by 2030 or sooner, as a
result of biodiversity loss from land use change, pollution, climate change and other drivers.
There is a realistic possibility that coral reefs in SE Asia and boreal forests will start to collapse from
2030, and rainforests and mangroves from 2050.
Preventing ecological collapse would require the reduction of human impacts, alongside
restoration of ecosystems. Restoration of some ecosystems (tropical forests) is more feasible than
others (coral reefs, Himalayas).
In Malawi, over 20 million trees have been planted
and 42,000 hectares of degraded land rehabilitated.
This has supported over 500,000 local residents with
improved access to water, diversified food production
and income sources. The number of participants
depending on humanitarian aid has declined by 60%.
Source: Restoring ecosystems to boost resilience to
climate shocks in Malawi, World Food Programme, 2023
Case study: protecting and
restoring ecosystems improves
food system and societal
resilience to shocks.
Planetary boundaries are the safe limits
identified by scientists for human pressure on nine
Earth system processes crucial for maintaining a stable
planet. As of 2023, six boundaries have been crossed:
(1) biosphere integrity (including biodiversity loss);
(2) climate change;
(3) land use change;
(4) freshwater change;
(5) nutrient flows (nitrogen and phosphorus); and
(6) novel entities (chemical and plastic pollution).
The three remaining boundaries are:
(7) stratospheric ozone depletion;
(8) atmospheric aerosol loading; and
(9) ocean acidification.
Source: Stockholm Resilience Centre, 2023
Since the drafting of this report, a new version of this research has been published.
The Times said it had seen an unabridged version of the report, and that the published version had been abridged to remove references to catastrophic risks including food-system collapse and nuclear war. BusinessGreen quotes from the Times saying that the earlier version contained starker warnings that deforestation in the Congo and the loss of Himalayan glaciers could drive increases in migration to Europe, leading to "more polarised and populist politics in the UK" and putting "additional pressure on already strained national infrastructure", and would "almost certainly escalate tensions" between China, India and Pakistan, potentially leading to nuclear war.
(2/2)
https://www.businessgreen.com/news/4524657/government-accused-suppressing-report-warning-catastrophic-climate-risks