okay I have successfully avoided responding to any of these directly but after having seen like the TENTH post today saying something like "we don't need to convince you to like AI, the revolution is coming whether you like it or not" I just have to reply, generally, to this whole sentiment: OKAY THEN. IF WE ARE GETTING LEFT BEHIND THEN LEAVE US BEHIND, ALREADY
@glyph This is why I tend to see the AI boosters like I do pick-up artists.
They won't take no for an answer, or leave us alone. They instead try every method of persuasion to get us to just give in.
@onepict @tante @glyph
Great piece, with as gem of an Easter egg within.
This essay by Robert Kingett flames my rage at the AI machine like thermite.
I’m just figuring out RSS, so I added his blog to my feed. Do you know if he’s here on Mastodon anywhere?
https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/the-colonization-of-confidence/
The recent TCRF DDoS comes to mind: https://icosahedron.website/@Xkeeper/117173816855247193
Same malicious behavior, but on a different scale.
"Take this example where a project had to deal with a 13000 line commit some guy decided to get an LLM to do “As an Experiment.” Even when the guy was asked to stop, he kept going to justify why he was doing it. Why it was such a good thing, and why the project should let him do it and accept the commit.
Oh.
There's that guy, We're not even in the bar."
This is a really good comparison.
Do you remember the MGTOW movement? I feel that's another parallel. It wasn't just that they wanted to leave women behind, it's that they spent so much time wanting women to know they were leaving them behind, almost as if the whole thing were just performative.
@passenger @glyph Oh wow I'd not come across them, or if I did I forgot.
I wish they could just forget the rest of us.
@onepict @pikesley @glyph This pickup artist comparison is new to me, and interesting. Thanks for the thoughts.
Maybe they notice that AI is super unpopular, and they're desperate for that to change because they desperately need to believe that AI is self-evidently super awesome at everything and anything ... when it so clearly is NOT.
I dunno ...
I am arguing against AI because I think it's actively bad if you use it. It's making my life worse. It's probably making _your_ life worse. I have specific, concrete, enumerated harms which I which to reduce in the world. But I cannot understand the desire to argue _back_ against this so forcefully and so sneeringly.
If the technology is, in fact, so self-evidently great, then you could go off and build cool shit with it, prove us all wrong, and demonstrate the net utility argument you're trying to make all in one. Log the fuck off! Stop diddling with your giant pile of markdown files that beg the robot to please stop making mistakes and BUILD SOMETHING GOOD!
There are lots of apps and libraries and tools that I already liked, that are getting infested with AI and either staying the same or getting worse. I would be lying if I said that everything was decaying into obvious slop, some quite high-quality projects are staying high-quality as far as I can tell. But there's no big leaps in functionality, no cool new features or better docs. Best case scenario is things kinda keep bumping along, with the maintainers *claiming* some efficiency I can't see.
“One more data center bro, just one more data center and I’ll build an app to reverse climate change”
The 68k Mac community has had a sudden influx of new apps, all super ambitious and interesting. None of the ones I tried actually worked. Just the illusion of progress through a ton of output.
But as a certified hater there is basically _nothing_ new I have seen where I thought, oh no, I like this, and it seems good, but I don't want to use it because it's AI. The way I find out things are AI is that they suck shit and I think "wait does this suck shit because it's AI?" and yes it does every single time