@internetarchive That link is to an organization which is quite disturbing. What are you even doing here?!

@internetarchive are you kidding me?? The adoption of so called "AI" is completely at odds with the preservation of information and art. Whoever is behind this should be ashamed of themselves.

@internetarchive what kind of greenwashing from hell is this.

@internetarchive good job burning countless resources to get answers we've had for decades. you really did it

@internetarchive First the @eff and now this. We're running out of orgs with a backbone now that they're more necessary than ever.

@internetarchive Not the IA as well?!

@internetarchive how big of a cognitive dissonance do you need to post this just ten days after showing your non-destructive, human labour based book digitising method which was obviously made to contrast news about companies destroying books to feed their LLMs?

Come on @internetarchive you can do better than this.

Other comments here point out how unreasonable this entire thing is much better than I could, so I won't play LLM here.

But you should read them and get your act together!

@internetarchive

@internetarchive Super not cool. What the fuck.

@internetarchive Ugh ... ethic washing of text extrusion machines is not what I expected from you.

@internetarchive why did you feel this was necessary or helpful

@internetarchive fuck your mom, make no mistakes

@internetarchive dudes, generative ai is CRINGE

@internetarchive No.

@internetarchive this post still exists after hours of pile on, why?

This is green washing shit and you know it.

@internetarchive just stop....

@internetarchive selling everyone out

@internetarchive And that is how you fucking stop being the Archive of the Internet, Internet Archive :)

Well done, surrendering to the corporate bandwagon wrecking what you were supposed to safeguard. But I'm not even gonna bother with the Star Wars meme.

You absolute disgrace. You absolute cowards.

@internetarchive
Fucking hell... You saw @eff jump off a cliff and were like "how can we shit our pants too?"

@internetarchive you just made me cancel my recurring donations after donating for several years.

@internetarchive prepare to get your ass handed to you, for you have fucked around and lo, the time is nigh to find out

@internetarchive yeah I don't want my money going to this either. Building a boil the ocean machine to stop boiling the ocean is stupid

@internetarchive Your donations come from a place of wanting to save historical record to preserve the truth of what people said - including preventing the super rich from shedding accountability

@internetarchive Oh, do fuck offff.

@internetarchive this sucks. im not donating to this

@internetarchive not you too

@internetarchive wtf is this shit?

@internetarchive hey, uh, what the fuck

ClimateGPT is an oxymoron, and exposing children to an LLM is unethical as fuck

@internetarchive why are you associating with any sort of ai company? why would you use your position to greenwash generative ai? this is so disappointing.

@internetarchive

How can you back CARTA, and this, at the same time?

@internetarchive First I thought I would write some sort of response along the lines of "WTF are you doing?", but I'm actually just too tired.

You are all grown-ups and you are literally working in a place that stores the world's knowledge. If you can't see why you, of all people, feeding knowledge into OpenAI's word blender and expecting new insights to appear is an useless exercise, then nothing I say can help you.

@internetarchive looks like it didn't work

@internetarchive An archival organization promoting GenAI? No. Take this down and donate to an organization actually fighting the climate crisis.

@internetarchive this doesn't make you guys look worthy of our support if you are going to feed the machines killing our creativity and cloning our content

@internetarchive please stop this

@internetarchive suspect they're gonna get some unfollows after this from some folks. Like me! 😂

@internetarchive

s/and thier attributes/and their attributes/

s/still make sense/still makes sense/

s/(Half of the answers are actuarial and half of) it is not/\1 them are not/ # (and no mention in the article of the response to the half of the question about the morality of it?)

s/and the data map was useful/and the data map were useful/

Who wrote this article? There is no byline.

The Internet Archive should not be associating themselves with the work this article is about. For shame.

@internetarchive Stop using the damned thing.

@internetarchive

i'm only here to add one more "what the fuck is this, have you lost your mind" comment.

i'm pretty sure we already have all of the information we need about why the climate of our planet is becoming more dangerous, and who did it. all you've done is include yourself in the answer to the "and we know who did it" part. why would you want to be one in that number?

@internetarchive just want to pile on and say that this pile-on is far kinder than it could deservedly be. Thanks for the valuable work you do, now please put down the *fascist* poop dispensing machine and go wash your hands.

@internetarchive You could stop with this shit any time now

@internetarchive

I never trusted these guys.

@internetarchive https://youtu.be/l60MnDJklnM

@internetarchive

Stop doing this.

It's a huge waste of resources.

You've done good work.

This is not good work.

@internetarchive This is so insulting I hope the climate scientists here on Mastodon are enjoying their Saturday instead of watching you doing THAT.