Is vibecoded but freely licensed software really free software, if it's unmaintainable and unreadable, as these tend to be? It's missing freedom #1, just from a more "practically possible" rather than "legally allowed" standpoint.
6
Replies
0
Boosts
@neon Speaking rhetorically:
If it took you little time to produce it, I'll spend no time using it.
Vibe-coded software is valueless. The value of software lies in the expertise, commitment, and unique creative expression behind it on the part of human authors. Without expertise, commitment, and unique expression, the software is worth nothing from the moment it has been extruded out.
@neon The maintenance angle really worries me, and causes me to nope out when I find a vibe-coded project. If you don’t know how to maintain and develop your own software, it’s not going to live very long as a project.
@deadsuperhero @neon I think you’re quite wrong about that. Nobody knows how to maintain a project. LLM assistance makes the programming part cheap. so among fully vibed projects, there’ll be competition for being the best maintained.
@lain @neon @deadsuperhero
> there’ll be competition for being the best maintained
is this based on reality or wishful thinking
> there’ll be competition for being the best maintained
is this based on reality or wishful thinking
@mono @neon @deadsuperhero there’ll be much more personal software, where no community is necessary (see https://lambadalambda.github.io/things-i-did-with-llms/). For actually community projects, it’ll be dominated by whoever can provide
@lain @neon @deadsuperhero
my point is that you cannot accurately evaluate how well a project is maintained without investing a lot of time and knowing a lot things.
nobody is choosing based off of community vibes or responsiveness to PRs.
the current state is one where we can only assume anything written will be completely unmaintained and it will be up to you to fix any known issues (lol if its a security issue and you are not an expert).
you are right that making things is the easy part, and maintaining them is the effortful part, but there is no incentive to build a reputation anymore because the whole FOSS paradigm is fucking broken and for suckers.
if you open sores anything in 2026, you are cattle tbh
my point is that you cannot accurately evaluate how well a project is maintained without investing a lot of time and knowing a lot things.
nobody is choosing based off of community vibes or responsiveness to PRs.
the current state is one where we can only assume anything written will be completely unmaintained and it will be up to you to fix any known issues (lol if its a security issue and you are not an expert).
you are right that making things is the easy part, and maintaining them is the effortful part, but there is no incentive to build a reputation anymore because the whole FOSS paradigm is fucking broken and for suckers.
if you open sores anything in 2026, you are cattle tbh
