#AI writing is ghostwriting. You are publishing words that you did not originate, and claiming them as your own. A WSJ editorial written with AI is like giving a human writer a list of your opinions, then taking the essay they create and sticking your name on it. It is unethical and disgusting, irrespective of whether or not your WSJ editor approves of the practice. All AI writing that can be identified as such with available tools to a high degree of certainty should be called out and marked for public shaming.
6
Replies
3
Boosts
@lauren I don’t know if this is the right tack to take. I prefer to highlight that, if you rely on AI, you miss out on the joys inherent in the creative process.
@jaseanton That only works if you enjoy writing. Many people don't, still need to, and still need to not let machines do the writing for them under their names.
@lauren but can’t everyone get to the point where they like to create?
@jaseanton I assume you're joking.
I have published AI-written words for 18 months. Three investors have called it 'your most lucid period yet.' My lawyer asked who wrote the last board memo. I said it was a collaboration between me and destiny. He didn't follow up. This is called CLOSING.
