There is one point at which I part ways with Puar, though: in describing the global media circulation of images of people intentionally wounded and maimed by the IDF during 2018 protests, she says, “These photographs of Palestinian men had an undeniable ideological impact, working to acculturate the ‘international community,’ such as it was, to accept Palestinian bodies as damaged, Palestinian men as powerless, and the Palestinian cause as lacking vitality and force.”
Surely she cannot be arguing that it would have been better for such images to remain unseen? Was (and is) it not vital to establish the pattern of what the IDF was (and is) doing to Palestinian bodies? I can easily imagine a righteous *demand* for such images to be seen, in a world in which their circulation was suppressed, and would support such a demand.
Nobody should be compelled to see their lives reduced to trauma porn, certainly – but sometimes documenting atrocity is the sole moral response remaining available.