Today I'm furious. Heavily furious. No, it's not the victim tone but the angry tone.
I escaped from Facebook and X because of far-right, and on Fediverse I have to argue with far-left.
AI is a big problem for water, climate, agriculture, ethics, copyright, the list of negative impacts is long and the discussion is long enough as well.
I just replied to a thread where a person said "I won't read anything where an image is AI-generated". Right, AI slop is polluting the web more and more. But I posed the question: an AI generated image could also be used by a blind podcaster using Castopod, not giving so much importance on visual for obvious reasons, investing every energy on written and audio creation - castopod asks for a mandatory cover image for standard podcast rss, no 1400x1400 picture, no podcast publishing. So, it's a barrier; AI could just create the title [welcome to john doe podcast] and that's all.
I think most sighted people live in a privileged world where they find a community holding out their hand anytime; I don't talk for other blind folks but I'm not that lucky.
That person compared me basically to a murderer "one murder is not less tolerable than a dozen murders. Ai drains lakes, etc etc etc"...
I wonder why those assholes take me as an example of person to make feel guilty, and do not talk to all those billionaires who are truly damaging the world. Humiliating a blind person is easier maybe, but I am not the one letting others humiliate me.
I can understand all discussions, but if you want to make me feel guilty, at least offer yourself. Not saying "find sighted help by yourself", if you really care of me not using AI-based assistive tech, at least propose: "you could ask me, let us keep in touch, I will do my best to give you my feedback". Then it's up to me to say yes please, or no thanks.
But if you just compare me to a murderer and nature destructor, well, my only answer is "you destroy Earth just pissing, shitting, breathing. Please leave this world, go to Mars by feet".