I don't get why people who want to use LLMs to generate code are grumpy because Codeberg doesn't want to host it.
Surely they can just use their LLMs to generate a replacement for Codeberg, which they can operate on whatever basis they choose?
35
Replies
·
0
Boosts
@neil my only slight niggle with Codeberg's policy is the slightly subjective (lack of) definition of "mostly generated", which I can't help feeling opens the door to endless debates about how much is too much.
@ahnlak Were I looking for somewhere to host LLM-generated code, I'd take the decision as a sign that I was not welcome on Codeberg, and look for hosting elsewhere.
@neil and SlopHub is right there, too.
@neil They're worried what else they might decide they don't want to host since they now ban things.
I am, of course, joking.
They can just run their own instance of forgejo, without needing to generate anything.
@neil Forgejo is *so* easy to host, too. I run my own just because I like having somewhere to keep scripts and bits for my servers.
@advancedrubbish Same!
For some stuff, just running git is ideal, but for other stuff, I like forgejo.
What if Forgejo starts using LLMs to craft itself? What if a library Forgejo starts using LLMs to craft itself?
The genetic fallacy is real, even though I agree with Codeberg's stance.
@neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk or even just self-host Forgejo, which their LLM surely is able to explain to them
@sijmen Ha! I've just posted exactly the same thing :)
