I get email.
Post
@pluralistic That could be an alternative formulation: Les Singes (Jacques Brel, early 60es).
@pluralistic if author, why use word? why no grunt
@pluralistic I was just thinking about this, and realised the sender didn't realise their luck you weren't Australian.
@pluralistic You made me smile - thank you! Please keep the questions coming.
@pluralistic it's the perfect word though
@pluralistic The term is perfect, and its French translation "Merdification" sounds great! I even heard hosts and journalists on the very serious Radio-Canada use it on different occasions.
@pluralistic I think the term is spot-on and important. That said, I have some squeaky clean people in my life where the conversation would flow so much more easily if we could use a G-rated term. With them, I will say "Crush ICE" not "Fuck ICE". So with them I guess I can also say, "a pretend upgrade that's actually a purposeful downgrade" rather than "enshittification."
@pluralistic enshitoniceification
@pluralistic this is so fucking funny.
@pluralistic it's short, graphic, denotes a process and most importantly pretty much everybody associates crap with shit, so looks like a pretty good work to me.
@pluralistic Enshitiffication is a perfectly cromulent word
@pluralistic well, the word kept me from learning about the idea it represents for quite a while. It wasn't until the CCC conference video a month ago I listened to you (Cory) the first time and was immediately convinced of the relevance and importance of what you write and talk about.
I guess it sounded like some trendy buzz word (which to some extent is probably the intent – to lean on that mannerism) and I wasn't interested in trendy buzz.
@pluralistic When I first heard the word:
- I immediately knew it was not corporate marketing jargon.
- I immediately knew it was something negative.
- I immediately knew it was something intense enough that I should probably be paying attention to it.
- I did NOT immediately know what it referred to, and as such wanted to understand it.
Seems like a pretty effective choice to me. 🤷
@pluralistic at first I thought the inclusion of "shit" detracted from the seriousness and intellectual vigor of the theory, but now I see where-- given the reception of general population and experts alike--this word does quite the opposite.