Post
Log in
Shouty person
Shouty person
@clacksee@wandering.shop  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
Case No. 8001497/2024 Page 68 …use if preferred, and only 1 out of 9,500 employees raised a concern about the impact of the policy despite multiple means to do so. Para 378. The claimant submitted that it was disproportionate to sacrifice the dignity and privacy of all female staff (20% of the workforce) to protect the interests of a tiny minority of trans staff (0.5 % of the workforce). However only 0.05% of the female workforce had complained or raised a concern about the policy (i.e. the claimant) and it cannot therefore be said that all women considered that their dignity and privacy had been sacrificed.
Case No. 8001497/2024 Page 68 …use if preferred, and only 1 out of 9,500 employees raised a concern about the impact of the policy despite multiple means to do so. Para 378. The claimant submitted that it was disproportionate to sacrifice the dignity and privacy of all female staff (20% of the workforce) to protect the interests of a tiny minority of trans staff (0.5 % of the workforce). However only 0.05% of the female workforce had complained or raised a concern about the policy (i.e. the claimant) and it cannot therefore be said that all women considered that their dignity and privacy had been sacrificed.
Case No. 8001497/2024 Page 68 …use if preferred, and only 1 out of 9,500 employees raised a concern about the impact of the policy despite multiple means to do so. Para 378. The claimant submitted that it was disproportionate to sacrifice the dignity and privacy of all female staff (20% of the workforce) to protect the interests of a tiny minority of trans staff (0.5 % of the workforce). However only 0.05% of the female workforce had complained or raised a concern about the policy (i.e. the claimant) and it cannot therefore be said that all women considered that their dignity and privacy had been sacrificed.