The QWERTY keyboard was designed to reduce mechanical jamming in early typewriters.
We kept it for computers. Which don't jam.
How many of our systems are just preserved solutions to problems that no longer exist?
And how would we even know?
Post
The QWERTY keyboard was designed to reduce mechanical jamming in early typewriters.
We kept it for computers. Which don't jam.
How many of our systems are just preserved solutions to problems that no longer exist?
And how would we even know?
@Daojoan Keyboard is a bit more complex (eg there are reasons typewriter is all one one row...)
Obvious other ones
- The 4'8 and a bit standard railway gauge was basically arrived at by network effects and nearby mining railways. It's way too narrow but we persist in running trains over it at high speed because it's easier than fixing the track width
- Long summer school holidays in many countries so kids could help with the harvest
- The floppy disk icon for save
@Daojoan the one that stays with me most is learning that crash test dummies were originally mostly adult male cadavers, and then when they replaced them with actual dummies, they were still mostly only male body types. I think they only evolved how they test vehicles in the 1990s, maybe, with a greater variety of test dummy shapes/sizes.
@Daojoan ..I think there's something similar with medical research or CPR dummies?
@Daojoan Right on Red
'fuel saving" measure during the 73 oil crisis. didn't work then, endangers everyone in public for nothing
As I vaguely recall, the standard 80 character column width for used terminals and recommended maximum line length for code (e.g., PEP-8) is a holdover from the IBM punch card standard that specified 80 columns, which is itself a holdover from early 19th century loom technology for fabric weaving.
@Daojoan @briankrebs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_institutionalism
I teach this in my IT-related business school courses.
@Daojoan This is not really true. QWERTY was (most likely) designed as a result of feedback from mechanical telegraph operators, in order to make their typing easier: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-qwerty-keyboard-will-never-die-where-did-the-150-year-old-design-come-from-49863249/
To the extent that the "jamming" story is true (to some extent, it is; jamming was a mechanical concern) the way that a layout avoids jamming is by placing letters that frequently occur adjacent to each other on opposing hands, which *is* better for operator ergonomics too.
@Daojoan Try calling a folder "aux", "con" or "lpt" on Windows. Y'know, for auxiliary files, the opposite of "pro" arguments, and life-pro-tips.
Screen characters have various standards for encoding those glyphs in binary, the most common are ASCII and Unicode. But along with the visible characters there are also codes to represent things like indentation (the tab character \t) or a new line (\n).
These codes used to control machinery. \n would roll the paper down in the teletype printer, and \r would return the print head to the start of the line.
1/2
This was long before computers in 1870. There was a control code, \a, to ring a bell as an alert.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_character
But these codes were built on the control codes for weaving looms which go back even further to the Jacquard loom in 1804:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquard_machine
Even to this day, if you open the Python interpreter and type print("\a") it will chime an alert.
2/2
@Daojoan lightheartedly pointing out, this is dangerously close to being a #nickland post
https://www.urbanomic.com/chapter/fanged-noumena-introduction-to-qwernomics/
@Daojoan
Monarchy?
Scroll lock?
Quite a lot of Men?
I switched to Dvorak keyboard layout and all was great. But the world didn't change with me 🥺
You are obviously unaeare of several dozens other existing keyboard layouts.
@Daojoan Try to rename your harddisk/SSD to letter A: or B: ...
@Daojoan Oh man don’t get me started.
“Special characters”
File extensions
File compression
@Cdespinosa @Daojoan I'm curious to hear your thinking on these.
@Daojoan please no, you’ll bring out the Dvorak crowd
‘Dvorak is more efficient, people who learn Dvorak can type faster’ I see this a lot, but the word per minute increase is because people who learn Dvorak are spending time *formally learning to type!*
Neither one is ‘more efficient’ than the other. How would you even measure that, it’s all so silly.