Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Sumana Harihareswara
@brainwane@social.coop  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

Recently read (reread?) Abraham Lincoln's letter to Joshua Speed from August 1855

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln2/1:339

which includes that "When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty" line.

There's a line in there that led me to https://www.kansasmemory.gov/item/display.php?item_id=6835&f=00972354 .

1/n

#USHistory

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Sumana Harihareswara
@brainwane@social.coop replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

The Kansas territory was north of the 36°30′ parallel, so, per 1820's Missouri Compromise, a *free* territory (that is, a territory where slavery was prohibited).

That's the basis for Lincoln saying in this letter: "By every principle of law, ever held by any court, North or South" (as of August 1855), any Black person who's entered Kansas -- including slaves brought there by their owners -- is free.

But proslavery forces wanted to change that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_Kansas

2/n

#USHistory

Bleeding Kansas - Wikipedia

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Sumana Harihareswara
@brainwane@social.coop replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

Lincoln points out that the Kansas territorial legislature has passed a law prohibiting -- on penalty of death -- informing Black people of their legal rights. That's "The Act to Punish Offences Against Slave Property", passed ten days before Lincoln's letter.

https://www.kansasmemory.gov/item/display.php?item_id=6835&f=00972354

Morbidly fascinating how the law phrases that.

3/n

#USHistory

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Sumana Harihareswara
@brainwane@social.coop replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

According to that law, it was a crime to "entice, persuade or induce any slave to escape from the service of his master or owner, in this Territory" (plus a bunch of other similar acts). & It became a crime to, in speech or writing, "assert or maintain that persons have not the right to hold slaves in this Territory" or to write or locally circulate "any book, paper, magazine, pamphlet or circular, containing any denial of the right of persons to hold slaves in this Territory".

#USHistory

4/n

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Sumana Harihareswara
@brainwane@social.coop replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

That's how it was phrased. It wasn't phrased as "it's illegal to tell people their rights." It was phrased in a way that presupposed particular falsehoods regarding who had what rights, and then prohibited stating certain facts or denying the falsehoods.

5/5

#USHistory

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-alpha.8 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login