Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
tante
@tante@tldr.nettime.org  ·  activity timestamp 5 hours ago

RE: https://ec.social-network.europa.eu/@EC_DIGIT/115564144071125950

Yeah you can save a lot of time by accepting that "it cannot" is the answer. You mustn't draft legislation with an LLM because in that context words do massively matter. And the words are a result of the intent and the analyses of problems that you have.

It's a ridiculous approach that shows just how little people know what they are doing.

(Kinda reminded me of the EU funding services running a survey if providing LLMs for application generation would be good: Why would you as EU provide spam generation engines whose output you then have to validate? You're making your life harder while reducing quality.)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Alex
@alexvp@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@tante It's frustrating to see more legitimate ideas like Rules as Code mixed up with the ‘AI’ bubble in the EU, given how unsuitable LLMs will be for the foreseeable future.

It's like we've collectively lost our minds and forgotten that automation without AI exists: every existing script, app and concept uncritically dissolved into the language of slop.

For a vague but pre-ChatGPT brief on human-written RaC in making legislation more efficient: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/cracking-the-code_3afe6ba5-en.html

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login