Post · bonfire.cafe

@internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org · 8 hours ago

What could a new court ruling mean for the future of Wikipedia?

Authors Alliance ( @AuthorsAlliance ) unpacks the surprising implications of the latest decision in Authors Guild v. OpenAI ⬇️
https://authorsalliance.substack.com/p/copyright-winter-is-coming-to-wikipedia

This is a guest post by Matthew Sag, Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science at Emory University Law School.

An illustration of a White Walker from Game of Thrones, depicted as a skeleton with glowing blue eyes and wearing dark armor and a fur cloak, sitting cross-legged on a block of ice in a snowy landscape while reading a tablet that displays a Wikipedia page.

Simon Villeneuve

@picolaton@jasette.facil.services replied · 7 hours ago

@internetarchive @AuthorsAlliance

un jugement dans une affaire impliquant OpenAI pourrait mettre en péril une partie de Wikipédia impliquant, notamment, les résumés d'oeuvres de fiction.

EamonnMR

@EMR@mastodon.sdf.org replied · 8 hours ago

@internetarchive @AuthorsAlliance

> I don’t see how the ChatGPT summary could infringe the copyright in George R. R. Martin’s novel, if the Wikipedia summary doesn’t. A chilling prospect indeed, but I don’t think that either one is infringing.

One of them is defensibly fair use, one of them is not.

silly butch

@melunaka@eldritch.cafe replied · 8 hours ago

@internetarchive @AuthorsAlliance
I feel disturbed that the Internet Archive is sharing an IA-generated image joined in the post, it feels like an implicit endorsement

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances

Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en

Automatic federation enabled