fixed that for you
2 media
Post
Replies:
0
@molly0xfff So whut? Wikipedia with massive government subsidies?
@molly0xfff And it's clearly not a wiki.
@molly0xfff I'd suggest he call it Dick-ipedia, but there's a non-zero chance that's an actual name he'd give it. What a loser.
@molly0xfff and all the press is doing him the biggest favor with free advertisement, with title like "With Grokipedia, Musk wants to bury down Wikipedia and impose his truth"... I'm so fed up about the press and the title they are choosing, always propagating the fascists ideas, sometimes with a question mark but most of the time, simply quoting one of them, without question.
@molly0xfff And soon, with a little help from Star Link, Musks AI fused right wing version of reality and "free speech" can be received all around the world and with his network of satellites getting ever more larger, there is no hiding. Something worth mentioning to the "come on, Tesla is just a car" fraction of one's friends.
@molly0xfff
I accept many things where other people have oher values or opinions (which is a sane thing to do), but this "project" is wrong on so many levels, that I'll ignore you immediately if you use it. Yes, even if it was ironic.
@molly0xfff @fzer0
There's a word in German(y) for that:
Verschlimmbessert. Which means something like "Wanted to improve but actually worsened" (literally: Im-terri-proved)
@molly0xfff He does understand that by taking Wikipedia text under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 licence he's required to make all future versions of his text available under the same licence, right? Right?
The rich see literally anything being used, and need to profit off of it.
@molly0xfff surely the whole point of AI is that it will make LLMs from existing stuff (without regard to copyright, right). So a new AI thingpedia would be trawling Wikipedia and would have to be a simulacrum of the original from which it derived its model. The copyright issues will be enormous, but that is also why they are important.
@molly0xfff Oh god "September 10, 2025 - The Grokipedia community token was first minted", I suppose _that_ was inevitable.
@molly0xfff "Imagine having a Wikipedia but 60% of every article is wrong!"
Mecha Hitler’s in control. What could go wrong?
I still would like to suggest that some team within Wikipedia or people who are willing to join it converge bit of code to detect Elon’s or just any AI companies bots and send them a special version of whatever they’re requesting
@molly0xfff In what universe is anyone (except musk fans) use a wikipedia made by him?...chances of veracity are not even zero, but negative.
