Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Criss 🇨🇦 yBliss
@Crissy@tech.lgbt  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

🧵 The Big 7 media giants shaping what most of the world watches, streams, and reads

1. Comcast: NBC, Universal, Sky, Peacock — cable, broadband, and Hollywood rolled into one

2. Disney: Marvel, Star Wars, ESPN, ABC — nostalgia and your kids’ favorite shows

3. Warner Bros.: Discovery, HBO, CNN, Max — drama, news, and nature docs

4. Paramount: CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon — big in broadcast and streaming

5. Sony: Movies, music, PlayStation — cross-cultural dominance

6. Netflix: Originals, algorithms, binge culture — the global studio in your pocket

7. Amazon: Prime Video, MGM, Twitch — retail entertainment meets surveillance capitalism

They own the pipelines and the stories.

What does #decentralization mean when 7 companies shape the global feed?

Can federated media offer real alternatives?

#MediaMonopoly #DecentralizeMedia #fediverse

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Criss 🇨🇦 yBliss
@Crissy@tech.lgbt replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

Started thinking more about media concentration after #FediCollective Brew Build 2.

Someone raised the question: how do decentralized platforms respond when most of the global feed is shaped by a handful of corporations?

It’s not just about hosting your own server or using open protocols. It’s about rethinking how stories are made, shared, and sustained outside corporate ecosystems.

Are we building new media, or just federating the old one?

Would love to hear from folks working on federated zines, podcasts, video hubs, alt-distribution tools (anything that challenges the default).

Drop links, ideas, critiques. Let’s map the alternatives. Thanks!

#MediaMonopoly #DecentralizeMedia #fediverse

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Paragone
@Paragone@hear-me.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@Crissy There are obviously 2 distinct dimensions involved:

IF there is to be a hierarchy of .. say trustworthy-news, or anything ..
( even the basic "these are unbiased on mediabiasfactcheck, those are biased, these are accurate, those aren't )

THEN that is *institution, or operation* centric..

IF there is to be people voting on what is important,

THEN .. the concentrator of that, needs to be a server or a network-of-servers..

IF ideological-control/political-control/for-profit-control is to control the fediverse's discussion,

THEN they need to make-certain that there's no *in-use* alternative to their machiavellianism..

( obviously, I want to break machiavellianism from ruling our world: they can keep their parasitic "heaven" to themselves )

---

Each dimension needs to be dealt-with separately,
*before* the different dimensions are brought-together into a functioning system-of-systems..

Mitigation-of-intentional-deformity ( ideological or money-motivated, or any other ), though, *has to go into the ranking-systems in the servers, doesn't it?

interesting: "feeds" are themselves distorting view, & those feeds need to be corrected to be filtering-out the stuff that *needs* filtering-out, for each user,
& *not* filtering-out the stuff that they need to see, or want to see..

& how can discovery be improved?

hmm...

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Criss 🇨🇦 yBliss
@Crissy@tech.lgbt replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@Paragone right on.

10/10 good point: trust in media often comes down to who’s running the show, while what gets seen depends on how platforms rank and filter content.

Seriously, if we (collectively) want less bias and better discovery, we need smarter systems that don’t just push what’s profitable or ideological BUT actually help people find what matters to them!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Paragone
@Paragone@hear-me.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@Crissy Which requires work AND infrastructure, both..

AND correct-framing!

---

Believe-me, I'm working on converting this-incarnation into the kind of help that can MAKE difference, in this kind of working.

( NObody's making the infrastructure work right!! )

My method's indirect,
but there's NO way for the incorporated-sociopaths ( corporations ) to do anything about *self-conquering/unitary-totality*:

it simply isn't something that this-world has any frame-of-reference for..

Muhahahaha, eh?

( this'll make sense after a tipping-point is crossed, in this-world's phases..

after the world's process phase-changes, look around, & sooner-or-later, you'll see the result,
and NObody will be able to *fake* being THAT one. : )

_ /\ _

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Cedric Knight 🌍💙
@cedric@greennet.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@Crissy has to also be about personal experience, investigating, work and getting out on the front line, doesn't it?

Otherwise it's just commentary on the professional/mainstream media.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Criss 🇨🇦 yBliss
@Crissy@tech.lgbt replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@cedric Absolutely! Naming the Big 7 is just the starting point. It’s the map, not the journey.

Real decentralization means getting out of passive consumption mode and into active engagement: making, investigating, collaborating, and questioning.

Otherwise, we’re just critiquing the mainstream from the sidelines while still playing by its rules as you pointed out.

What does “front line” look like for media today? Could be a zine, a podcast, a peer-to-peer archive, a local story told without filters. It’s personal, messy, and necessary.

Thanks for pushing this deeper Cedric!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.21 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login