@jonny Could I possibly encourage you to add a brief 1-2 sentences-or-so "Social Considerations" section -- or, well, the way you organized your headings a "Social" heading in your "Discussion" section -- next to "Privacy" and "Security".

I think in this case the basic Social motivation and implication for this specifically is reasonably obvious to everyone in the discussion right now, but because that obviousness won't be as available to people looking back at this during a more future implementation and won't be as available to people reading this looking for interactions with their own drafting FEP at a later point, it's worth including in the text itself.

If you don't want to or if this isn't the sort of feedback you're looking for no worries and sorry for imposing.
(Alternatively if you'd be up for it but have many other things atm, and if you trust me enough, I could try to grab time from dodging between the holidays at the moment and do a brief one for you, if you want.)

@jonny The technical details of the spec largely go over my head, so I don't have any feedback, but I'll tag @dmitri because he'll probably want to check this out and see how it fits into https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/7952/fep-7952.md Cool to see constructive work on this problem. 👍

and no it doesn't require emitting and processing 100,000 Move activities to 10,000 instances at once