Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Dave Rahardja
@drahardja@sfba.social  ·  activity timestamp 6 days ago

I am *really* skeptical of Bezos’ claim that data centers in space can essentially mooch off free solar power and operate at lower cost than on earth.

Ignoring the cost of sending up tons of server infrastructure, and how they would be prohibitively expensive to maintain and upgrade, and how one might have to deorbit them, I think the main problem of trying to extract massive amounts of work from solar power is COOLING.

Unlike on earth, which has a plentiful supply of cool water that removes the heat of your GPUs through conduction and which you can dump into the environment, heat dissipation in space is primarily done through infrared radiation, which is *very* inefficient in comparison.

Wikipedia says that IR radiation panels in space can be expected to dissipate up to 350 W per square meter. A gigawatt plant would need 2.8 *million* square meters of radiating surface.

lol.

#space

“Data centres in space? Jeff Bezos says it's possible”

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/data-centres-space-jeff-bezos-thinks-its-possible-2025-10-03/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Dave Rahardja
@drahardja@sfba.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 6 days ago

And that’s ignoring the size of the solar panels needed. Assuming high efficiency panels, you’d get around 500 W per square meter in space near earth, which means you’d need 2 million square meters of solar panels for a gigawatt plant, in addition to the radiators.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.13 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login