Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Jiří Eischmann
@sesivany@social.vivaldi.net  ·  activity timestamp 7 days ago

One of my posts here gained popularity in the #Flathub vs. traditional #Linux distributions debate and I still stand by my claim that @flathub enforces its rules more strictly than Linux distributions and checks maintainers more thoroughly. None of my #Fedora packages have ever been held for review after being accepted into the repositories.
Even though it's a complication for me as a maintainer, I approve it.

A screenshot of a message from Flathub saying: Build #215117 of Datovka (org.cznic.Datovka) has been held for review because the app's metadata has changed. Check the status of the review in the app developer settings.
A screenshot of a message from Flathub saying: Build #215117 of Datovka (org.cznic.Datovka) has been held for review because the app's metadata has changed. Check the status of the review in the app developer settings.
A screenshot of a message from Flathub saying: Build #215117 of Datovka (org.cznic.Datovka) has been held for review because the app's metadata has changed. Check the status of the review in the app developer settings.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.1 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login