@janl you mean besides the person who controls all of it being a very proud Nazi?

@janl ok so yes this looks really really bad but:

""we were offered millions of dollars from a hostile donor in exchange for control of the RubyGems infrastructure” <-- that's a HELL of an accusation to make, and I can't see any evidence of that whatsoever. Is there something I'm missing?

Because otherwise until we learn more this really seems like a "never attribute to malice what you can attribute to incompetence" sort of situation - right?

broken ruby gems social scene or something 😄 #SorryBrokenSocialScene #RubyIsMyFavouriteProgrammingLanguageButItIsNotImmuneToTheFollyOfHumans :-)

@janl they looked at npm and said “Hold my beer”

@janl I know this is about the programming language and presumably gems are a type of library or package, but for a second I thought "oh shit, are there any other langs named after gems like Ruby and Perl that are compromised"

@janl there's a ton of #Jekyll sites out there which are also #Ruby-based.

@janl

It wouldn't be hard to just pull the gems from git directly, then put the commit IDs into a checked-in lock file the way mruby does it. From there, you could automate pushing the clones to your own repos if you need them.

@janl What a mess.. and what does that mean for mastodon which is written in ruby.

@janl arrrghhhh!