Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

minds.com is a social media service founded in 2011, notable for publishing source code for their platform under a free license (AGPL);

https://developers.minds.com/docs/contributing/license/

In 2021 they decentralised their in-house chat by connecting it to the Matrix network;

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1236784837018611712

#TIL that minds.com is implementing ActivityPub and connecting to the fediverse;

https://networks.minds.com/blog/post/what-is-the-fediverse-the-next-evolution-of-social-media

(1/2)

#fediverse#ActivityPub#Minds

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

Has anyone tried to use the AGPL-licensed code published by Minds.com to stand up their own community-hosted service? If that works, we'll add it to fediverse.party;

https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fediparty/issues/277

On the face of it, this would give you access to both ActivityPub and Matrix networks, under one set of login credentials. Not sure what moving parts are involved, what the resource usage would be, or whether the code in their repo is sufficient;

https://gitlab.com/minds

#Minds#CommunityHosting

@ottman

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
julian
@julian@community.nodebb.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

Re: minds.com is a social media service founded in 2011, notable for publishing source code for their platform under a free license (AGPL);

@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz interesting... I hadn't heard of them until just now.

Do they have a presence on the fediverse I wonder?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
wakest ⁂
@liaizon@social.wake.st replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
@julian @strypey yep @minds
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

Unlike most centralised alternatives created in reaction to DataFarming scandals (Ello, Unseen.is, CoHost), Minds managed to reach critical mass despite being a Walled Garden. Part of that, no doubt, was pitching themselves as a free speech platform. At a time when DataFarms were becoming more risk averse in their moderation, in respond to pressure from advertisers.

As a result, they've sometimes been compared to Gob and Lies.social, but this is unfair IMHO;

https://www.minds.com/change/blog/faq-minds-deradicalization-1038874126241513472

(2/2)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
PaulaToThePeople
@PaulaToThePeople@climatejustice.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
@strypey Minds has been on our blocklist for a long time. It's free speech misunderstanding crypto bs.

From Wikipedia: "Minds has been described as less rigorous about removing objectionable content than more mainstream social networks."

Than.
Mainstream.
Social.
Networks.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-alpha.8 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login