Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
knoppix
@knoppix95@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

Denmark 🇩🇰 just passed a groundbreaking law: citizens now own the copyright to their own face, voice, and body.

This is a major win against AI deepfakes and unauthorized digital identity use. The digital self is officially personal property! 💥

#Denmark#Law#DigitalRights#Deepfakes#AIethics#Privacy#PrivacyMatters #AIRegulation#AI#ArtificialIntelligence#DataOwnership#DigitalIdentity#AIforGood#FacialRecognition#Copyright#EthicalAI#TechNews#IdentityTheft#PersonalData#LegalTech

A young woman with blonde hair and light eyes stands confidently in front of a red and white background resembling the Danish flag. Text overlay reads: “Denmark just passed a revolutionary law: citizens now own the copyright to their own face, voice, and body. A new war on AI deepfakes has begun.”
A young woman with blonde hair and light eyes stands confidently in front of a red and white background resembling the Danish flag. Text overlay reads: “Denmark just passed a revolutionary law: citizens now own the copyright to their own face, voice, and body. A new war on AI deepfakes has begun.”
A young woman with blonde hair and light eyes stands confidently in front of a red and white background resembling the Danish flag. Text overlay reads: “Denmark just passed a revolutionary law: citizens now own the copyright to their own face, voice, and body. A new war on AI deepfakes has begun.”
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
@jwcph@helvede.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
@knoppix95 Dane here & I'm still gonna have to hear a Danish law person about this because I'm not sure that's what this law means & that's a good thing; personal ID as a copyright ownership issue is a TERRIBLE idea.

From my reading the law in question specifically outlaws publishing a realistic digital likness of someone without their consent, but doesn't say that it's because they own (!) the copyright - seems more like a special case of "droit moral"/ideal rights. I'm just a layman though.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.2.21 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login