Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Bonfire
Bonfire
@bonfire@indieweb.social  ·  activity timestamp 6 months ago

@nicebread This is exactly the kind of feedback we're looking for! we were thinking of hiding the quantitative metrics widget by default and letting users show it on demand if they want it... to be more aligned with https://coara.eu/agreement/the-commitments/ (which also @fresseng pointed us to few days ago)
Would this approach make sense to you?
@openscience@a.gup.pe

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Felix Schönbrodt
Felix Schönbrodt
@nicebread@scicomm.xyz replied  ·  activity timestamp 6 months ago

@bonfire @fresseng @openscience@a.gup.pe Not providing the metrics at all would be a value statement. But hiding it by default is definitely a step in the right direction!

Another idea, focused on the discussion content (and again depending on computational resources): Could you provide on-the-fly literature suggestions for current discussions? And in particular flag members of the community that have published to that topic?

Similar: Ping members of the community if a discussion touches an area of their expertise?

(Which all should be opt-in features, as not all members may want that).

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.7 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct