Post
Documented support for FEP-844e.
Cool, I'll add you to the implementation list.
Do you have any feedback, or suggestions? This FEP is very new and probably needs refinement
On the receiving end, I'm not sure we'd do any pre-flight requests to understand what an instance implements before acting on it, we'd probably rather stay conservative or do things like double-knock with caching, would be my guess. Might be different if it was something we could grab with a HEAD req.
Maybe there are alternatives that could be considered? `supports`?
implements because there are 4 or 5 implementations of this FEP already... The clash with a reserved keyword in some languages shouldn't be a big problem -- type is even more common keyword yet it is everywhere in ActivityPub.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate