Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Björn Brembs
@brembs@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

And yet another one in the ever increasing list of analyses showing that top journals are bad for science:

"Thus, our analysis show major claims published in low-impact journals are significantly more likely to be reproducible than major claims published in trophy journals. "

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.07.663460v2

#publishing #openscience #reproducibility

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Oliver Brendel
@olibrendel@scicomm.xyz replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
@brembs not really that astonishing, no ? In order to publish in trophy journals, your results need to shine, giving a tendency to overinterpretation, and thus making the results less reproducible....
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.13 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login