The piece itself is relatively ok, apart from the SGX thing.
The problem is the clickbaity title suggesting Signal might not be safe.
Most people only read headlines and the first few paragraphs of articles, and so what they might incorrectly take away from this piece is that Signal's safety is somehow suspect.
It's not. Signal is safe.
This is outright *dangerous* at a time when effective, usable privacy and encryption tools are more important than ever – and under attack globally.
5/🧵/end
@rysiek People who conclude by reading headlines only can't be helped. But it's also dangerous to ask people to uncritically trust a #messenger app that doesn't federate, thus forces them into a closed platform, that has known vulnerabilities (https://arxiv.org/html/2411.11194v4) and that relies on infrastructure based in a country which European services start to see as a security threat.
